McCain suspends campaign
Sep. 24th, 2008 05:03 pmMcCain has suspended his campaign because of the financial crisis. He hsa asked the debate commission to postpone Friday night's debate.
My thought? I think he's got Yet Another Medical Problem (you know, he's had cancer multiple times, right?) and needs to stall while the campaign figures out what the hell to do.
My thought? I think he's got Yet Another Medical Problem (you know, he's had cancer multiple times, right?) and needs to stall while the campaign figures out what the hell to do.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:26 pm (UTC)I agree with MGK on this one (http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2008/09/24/when-they-bend-over-thats-when-you-begin-fucking/).
"Five ways the Obama campaign can respond without appearing ungentlemanly in a “McCain wants to work to solve the problem and Obama wants to campaign” sort of way:
1.) Offer that the first debate instead be about economic policy.
2.) Agree to cancel the debate, then hold a televised townhall meeting in its place about foreign policy.
3.) Agree to cancel the debate, then hold a televised townhall meeting in its place about the economy.
4.) A combination of 2 and 3.
5.) Go to Washington, use magic powers, solve all economic problems forever via secret words of the Vishanti, then hold original debate as planned."
I absolutely think Obama's reaction should be some version of, "Now is not the time to suspend the discussion of how to solve these problems. Now is the time to discuss them in earnest!" Or something far more eloquent than that, because he's more eloquent than I am, which is part of why I want him as my president. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:07 pm (UTC)If you're right
Date: 2008-09-24 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:15 pm (UTC)They'd like to win on "American Idol" points, not have any sort of REAL discussion. I didn't get idea that he was suspending his whole campaign, but rather than he wasn't going to debate..
I say: Fine, suspend your campaign if you wish... but you'd damn well better meet Obama on the debate floor. This election is too important for you to weasel out of actual debate. And if you think we're going to suspend OUR campaign for a financial crisis that is of your party's making--you've another think coming.
To quote a previous, winning, Democratic campaign: "It's the economy, Stupid."
;)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:59 pm (UTC)"We do not support government bailouts of private institutions. Government interference in the markets exacerbates problems in the marketplace and causes the free market to take longer to correct itself."
- 2008 Republican Party Platform, (Rebuilding Homeownership), adopted September 2008
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:07 pm (UTC)win a warfix the economy.Now they're proposing that Friday's scheduled presidential debate be rescheduled for the date of the vice-presidential debate, which would then (supposedly) be rescheduled for some undetermined date in the future. Of course, there won't be a mutually acceptable date until after election day, so the McCain camp gets Palin out of debating. How convenient.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:25 pm (UTC)Really what it is, is an emotional appeal -- McCain looks like he *cares* about the people because he wants to "drop everything" and help. It doesn't matter that he can't help, he gets credit among the republicans for the sound byte of "this country's people are more important than the debates."
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:48 am (UTC)http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/gabrielle_chua/2008/09/controversy-that-unnecessarily.html
It's the same deal -- Winfrey said long before Palin ever was chosen that she wouldn't have any candidates on her show after the primaries, and yet there's an *outrage* that Winfrey endorses Obama but "refuses" to have Palin on the show and is "giving Palin the cold shoulder".
Win-win for McCain-Failin' -- they didn't start the controversy:
http://www.palinpetition.com/
http://www.palinpetition.com/affiliates.html has the list of decidedly right-wing sounding "non-partisan" founders of the petition.
So Obama can't complain, because this isn't an action by the McCain campaign. And it doesn't actually matter that Winfrey made up her mind before Palin was chosen, go ahead and read some articles from various news sources that basically say they have no idea why Winfrey is "snubbing" Palin (or that it's because Palin ain't black):
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/sarah-palin-opr.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Story?id=5736716&page=1
http://www.nypost.com/seven/09062008/news/nationalnews/palin_clubbed_by_oprah_snub_127736.htm
http://stupidcelebrities.net/2008/09/05/oprahs-palin-interview-photos/
Even on Oprah's site people are refusing to believe that Oprah isn't backpedaling:
http://oprah.about.com/b/2008/09/05/oprah-and-the-sarah-palin-controversy.htm
The daily kos points out that we don't even know if Palin asked to be on the show:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/15/111757/401
Sure, Fox news is up there, and no, I didn't quote very many liberal sites, but do you think most of America is following liberal media, or ABC, NBC, FOX, CNN?
As I said before, even when Obama demands the debate, he loses, because then he's seen as a guy who doesn't care about the country's current "crisis", he'd rather talk than act.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 01:09 am (UTC)Astroturfing on blogs does occasionally have an impact, but usually it doesn't. And saying that "The daily kos" pointed something out because someone posted a diary that got 21 comments and 3 recommendations is a misunderstanding. I posted a diary there myself this afternoon that got 22 comments and 5 recommendations and I sure wouldn't be presumptuous enough to say that Daily Kos says what I said.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:42 pm (UTC)It's not that the narrative you suggest won't be out there; it's just that way too few people in and out of themedia will buy into it for it to be a net gain for McCain.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 03:03 pm (UTC)