I'm an investor... again
Jan. 31st, 2007 12:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A few weeks ago I impulse-purchased The Little Book That Beats The Market, mostly because the foreword is by someone I trust. I read it, and it was basically my investment strategy, but he worked out a trick that makes the difficult math disappear.
According to his simulations, you can turn $15k into a million in 17 years. That’s when I retire. So I hope to invest $30k.
Wish me luck!
According to his simulations, you can turn $15k into a million in 17 years. That’s when I retire. So I hope to invest $30k.
Wish me luck!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 02:07 am (UTC)That is not a small number.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:31 pm (UTC)Is that relevant?
Oh, also, it occurs to me that I misspoke - to accomplish the financial goal you propose, with a one-time $15k investment, would require an after tax return of more than 24% annually, sustained for 17 years in a row. So, annual returns of 30%, assuming no significant transaction costs. Which is still a really big number. That's not just beating the market, that's beating the market by a lot, all the time.
(A point of clarification: I am a strong advocate of individual equity ownership; in my experience, there is a high correlation between avoiding the stock market and maintaining a slowly falling level of purchasing power and relative wealth. However, expecting to be done because you buy in once is extremely optimistic, given how short your time horizon is)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:32 pm (UTC)The estimates are that the system loses money 1 year our of 4, but makes it up in the longer term. It's basically a fast way to find mispriced stocks, and the prose is just a joy to read.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:50 pm (UTC)IE, about as frequently as the market as a whole does...
but makes it up in the longer term
Right - do you see why getting returns above 30% on an ongoing basis is a challenge?
Remember, if I have a dollar, and I buy something with it that has variable value, and that value falls by 10%, I need for it to then gain 11% to recover it's original value. If it falls by 20%, I need for it to go back up by 25% just to get back where I started.
Again, my complaint is not with owning stocks, nor is it with Value Investing as a basic strategy. My complaint is that 'I can put $30k in now and get a megabuck back really soon' is broken.