Date: 2006-10-29 09:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gatopreto.livejournal.com
What I have heard is that this was accidentally put in the children's section and not intended for children.

Date: 2006-10-29 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baerana.livejournal.com
the article did say it was marketed for adults, so that makes sense

Date: 2006-10-29 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dossy.livejournal.com
BEST. TOY. EVAR.

Thanks Tom, this gave me a really good laugh. Someone at Tesco ought to be SO fired right now. :-)

Date: 2006-10-30 04:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimuchi.livejournal.com
If it were on the shelves of the toy section, probably, But this whole idiotic kerfluffle was strictly about the *website*.

Date: 2006-10-29 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holzman.livejournal.com
Read the article more closely and go right on not believing it. The article clearly states the toy was marketed as being for adults. The ruckus comes because someone couldn't figure out that adults play with toys, too.

Date: 2006-10-30 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainbear.livejournal.com
I agree fully--pole dancing is far more appropriate for boys... ;-D

Date: 2006-10-31 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feklar.livejournal.com
i especially like this quote: "This should only be available to the most depraved people who want to corrupt their children." How did I miss the pole-dancing fitness craze? OTOH, this could be a fun party game assuming the booze is real.

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 5th, 2026 10:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios