yesthattom: (Default)
[personal profile] yesthattom
http://www.theurer.cc/blog/2006/09/29/launching-the-un-launch-able/

And... every phisher in the planet smiles, jumps up, and yells, “Yippie! I’m gonna be RICH!”

This is going to be a bad, bad, idea that Yahoo comes to regret ever considering.

Date: 2006-10-04 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dossy.livejournal.com
The truth is the phishers have been getting rich just fine before. At least now, we can legitimately take advantage of Y! services.

As my friend Joe said, "Now I can finally write the 'forward my Y! mail to Gmail' script ..." -- heh.

Date: 2006-10-05 06:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmitz.livejournal.com
Uh, you know google basically already has the same thing, right? Anyway, I see this as a good thing, particularly since as opposed to google's which requires you have *some* access to their google account, yahoo's can just use their authentication credentials as a SSO procedure, though they're still working on the details of that.

Of course, I'm also still bitter at the 6 char google minimum, making my preferred username impossible.

Date: 2006-10-05 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yesthattom.livejournal.com
Google doesn't let other people use their SSO system for their own apps at this time.

Date: 2006-10-05 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmitz.livejournal.com
From my reading, Yahoo's system is not significatnly different from Google Authentication at this point. Except that Yahoo's system does not require that the user give some permissions for the destination web app to access the user's data. In my reading of the google docs, it can be used for web authentication, it's not really as clean, though.

http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/AuthForWebApps.html

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 5th, 2026 10:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios