yesthattom: (Default)
[personal profile] yesthattom
"The proposal would require Internet providers to filter out content that could be objectionable to children."

I doubt that children find most of that stuff objectionable. The proposal is to filter stuff that is politically unpopular. Since some of that stuff is content that parents don't usually want children to see, they are emphasizing that.

The first web filtering system I used blocked a site for women with breast cancer. I had co-workers with parents/wives/others with breast cancer that wanted to learn more so they could provide the best support. They had to go through a humiliating process to request an exception for the particular web sites.

That was 1995. It hasn't gotten any better since.

Date: 2010-03-25 04:05 pm (UTC)
lovingboth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovingboth
The one I came across - at a project for male and trans sex workers - blocked the whole bbc.co.uk site because it found a page containing the word 'breast'.

Date: 2010-03-25 04:14 pm (UTC)
ceo: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ceo
I seem to recall that the term "hooter cancer" had a brief surge in popularity during AOL's first foray into content filtering.

Date: 2010-03-26 12:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dpfesh.livejournal.com
I genuinely see sites that could help me learn different ways to be a better Supervisor / Worker Bee.. but you know what? they're all blocked because they are related to "Job Hunt Sites".
Yet i could get to OkCupid for months?!

Ahhh, i hate firewalls. Just ping anyone that visits like..www.ass.org at work a billion times a week and fire them. Get over it. ..oo..big scary interwebs.. ~waggles fingers~

Date: 2010-03-26 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barking-iguana.livejournal.com
The kids at my school have figured out how to get to porn, but math games are blocked.

Date: 2010-03-26 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] awfief.livejournal.com
Actually, if you could explain cancer to a child in such a way that they'd understand it, they'd totally find it objectionable. But you'd traumatize the child, most likely. :)

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 9th, 2026 08:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios