Filled it in (that'll put their nickers in a twist). Wow there were some very biased questions (and not in the way that the one you picked out is).
Well worded: Do you agree with the Obama Administration’s decision to discard the phrase “War on Terror” and replace it with “overseas contingency operations?”
Not so well worded: Do you approve of the Obama Democrats’ plan to give more than $100 billion in taxpayer funds to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) even though that money is likely to end up in the hands of tyrannical regimes?
Excuse me, but the IMF does a lot of good (yes, they screw up too, but so does every large bureaucracy). That's just disingenuous.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2009-07-02 04:14 pm (UTC)Well worded:
Do you agree with the Obama Administration’s decision to discard the phrase “War on Terror” and replace it with “overseas contingency operations?”
Not so well worded:
Do you approve of the Obama Democrats’ plan to give more than $100 billion in taxpayer funds to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) even though that money is likely to end up in the hands of tyrannical regimes?
Excuse me, but the IMF does a lot of good (yes, they screw up too, but so does every large bureaucracy). That's just disingenuous.
Paul