2 years of uptime
Jul. 10th, 2005 10:46 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
newjoisey.whatexit.org% uptime 1:31am up 703 day(s), 5:26, 11 users, load average: 0.19, 0.12, 0.14
In 27 days my server will have been up for 2 years.
TWO FREAKIN’ YEARS.
BSD’s don’t be hurtin’,
Linux don’t you whine,
Keep your mouth shut Windows,
can’t beat Solaris uptime!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-10 10:47 pm (UTC)..and the last time you did any security patches was...
*duck & run* ;-) ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 06:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-10 11:01 pm (UTC)Those of us in NetBSD land do just fine ... on the right hardware:
They suck power (good thing it's cheaper in NV than CA), and they are troublesome to cool (it's good that the nights are cool up here at 6,500 feet), but there ain't nothing like a good ol' DEC Alpha.
careful there hoss ...
Date: 2005-07-11 03:02 am (UTC)(oh, and i've had linux uptime like that, too ... )
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 04:52 am (UTC)Two years without adding patches.
I think it's safe to say that Unix/Linux has won the uptime wars, hands down.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:48 am (UTC)Oh, and required patching every two-four months, many of which want a reboot afterwards.
*sigh*
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:23 pm (UTC)When the bug was reported, the reply we got was, "Gosh, most Linux users patch and reboot so often this isn't an important issue."
I hope that 10 years late Linux maintainers have improved their attitude.
indeed
Date: 2005-07-11 10:23 am (UTC)# uptime
10:24am up 1332 day(s), 7 min(s), 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.01, 0.02
(the last one was due to a datacenter wide power shutdown to do some maint. on the electric systems.)