fortunately, i have a screen machine :> between that, the do not call lists for mere telemarketers, and an answering machine, pretty much the only time the phone rings is when a live human who is probably okay, is doing it.
making my phone ring, after you've dialed the number, is a contract. can i enforce that in small claims? apparently: yes.
Credit card companies now can create disposable credit card numbers that are used for one single purchase and then invalidated. Why can't we do similarly with E-mail?
*blink* I don't think I've ever considered email a reliable method of communication comparable to phones, even before the endless september or the spammers.
Email is a middle ground between the phone and postal mail. If that choice is removed it won't all gravitate to the phone. It will bifurcate back into the camps from whence it came, with some leftovers going into 'face-to-face meeting."
I had a journal entry about this very issue back about a year ago. It's gotten worse, but the steep climb in the curve has mellowed. Unfortunately, the real issues we have to deal with in email are: internationalization, compromised hosts (so IP spoof protection is irrelevant), and the 'first communication' problem. Solutions to those issues (heavy filtering, SPF, auto-responders for first comm) have their own serious drawbacks (mail loss or delay, SMTP forwarding, and doubling effective spam/worm volume, respectively). For the foreseeable future, plain old SMTP email is going to be a balancing act of value vs. effort. Many large corporations are already doing trusted partner whitelists and back-channels for avoiding filters, etc. for business critical communications.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 04:33 pm (UTC)making my phone ring, after you've dialed the number, is a contract. can i enforce that in small claims? apparently: yes.
http://www.spectrumresearchinc.com/
#
no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 02:25 pm (UTC)Credit card companies now can create disposable credit card numbers that are used for one single purchase and then invalidated. Why can't we do similarly with E-mail?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-22 04:30 pm (UTC)"I was understandably worried until I saw the letter was addressed to 'Occupant'."
Date: 2004-09-22 05:14 pm (UTC)Talking to the animals,
-----wayward
Glad I don't get as much third-class mail about Viagra
Date: 2004-09-22 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 09:31 am (UTC)