Date: 2006-09-07 04:36 pm (UTC)
Not quite sure why you insist on ranting against a straw man, instead of actually trying to understand libertarian doctrine and its position on a number of the issues that you write about. Misrepresenting the libertarian position so you can attempt to hold it up to ridicule is pretty much the same thing that idiots like Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh do with the left; maybe it scores a few points with an unsophisticated audience, but it does not hold up to any sort of factual analysis, and they just end up looking like buffoons. You're much more intelligent than that, and this type of rhetorical appeal is, shall we say, less than flattering.

Again, libertarians do not, under any circumstances, condone fraud, and the prohibition against the use of force or fraud to achieve economic or political goals is the most fundamental libertarian principle. Tricking people into installing malware through hidden disclaimers and fake click-through "agreements" is fraud; no valid contract is formed.

Since contract law and theory is central to libertarian principles, it is especially important to determine the actual intent to form a contract. While libertarians believe that people should be free to agree to all sorts of things, including things that the government might not approve of, that is by no means license to defraud people. And what's worse, I'm sure you actually know that, but have chosen to overlook it in order to attack a straw man. Come on; you can do much better than that.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 10:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios