http://video.google.com/
Feb. 3rd, 2005 10:24 amhttp://video.google.com/
I have to say that one of the coolest things about working for Bell Labs in the 90s was seeing amazing technology before anyone else. However, the worst part of working at Bell Labs was seeing that technology and knowing that it would never see the light of day because management couldn’t get their heads out of their asses and figure out how to market it.
I have to say that one of the coolest things about working for Bell Labs in the 90s was seeing amazing technology before anyone else. However, the worst part of working at Bell Labs was seeing that technology and knowing that it would never see the light of day because management couldn’t get their heads out of their asses and figure out how to market it.
Google Video is an almost exact duplicate of a project some of my users developed in the mid-90s. I hear that Google Labs is hiring old Bell Labs people left and right. I wonder if they’re all just ‘re-inventing’ all the old stuff that Bell Labs couldn’t turn into a product.
I know that’s what I would do if I was sitting on a career of amazing products that never saw the light of day. The hardest part would be to decide which to productize under the Google Labs name first.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-03 07:47 am (UTC)Video Search
Date: 2005-02-03 08:19 am (UTC)A couple years ago I met a guy on a plane who worked for BBN. They were working on a project for NTK (Japanese TV) to index their video archives. I think the project he was talking about was actually doing speech recognition, not just scraping closed captioning.
Since the Google Video release, I've heard a few people mention that they'd seen or worked on similar projects over the years. I think it was one of those good ideas that needed a launchpad.
And besides, you just *know* they were doing it at Xerox PARC in the early 80's ;)
Re: violation of NDAs, California's not so much a place where those things get battled. Patents, yes, but good ideas in individual people's heads, not so much.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-03 08:25 am (UTC)It was also fast, dirt-cheap, and had huge industry support (they were begging us to get it done.) So why did no one ever see it? It was right after the dot-com crash and everyone was terrified of technology. No one in the industry wanted to foot the bill unless everyone did and but special interests were holding out demanding we make custom features benefiting them. Investors didn't understand how crippled today's product management tools are, so it was a tough sell to them.
Today that product is sitting half-finished on a few hard-drives and the last of the lawsuits is winding down. I woulda been rich, damn it. But then, so many people thought that :/
Re: Video Search
Date: 2005-02-03 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 02:17 am (UTC)I know well what being on that list means: anyone with curiosity and a browser can get a notion of your net worth, and there are lots of calls from "investment managers" who have a hot stock to sell you, ala Boiler Room.