The article you reference does a good job of preaching to the choir, but won't change any minds. The bias is too obvious; telling us a lot about the history of the Viet Nam conflict in the "Bush" column provides background, but Bush wasn't responsible for Viet Nam. It fails to make the point that Bush wasn't responsible for anything else, either.
I'm still looking over the johnkerry.com website, and while I'm finding some good policies hidden away on the 3rd and 4th levels of detail, the fact that that's where I find them points to a problem with "the vision thang." I'll be calling Trenton today to see if I can find who I need to help, but if you have any idea who I should be talking to I'd appreciate it if you'd forward the information.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-28 04:06 am (UTC)The article you reference does a good job of preaching to the choir, but won't change any minds. The bias is too obvious; telling us a lot about the history of the Viet Nam conflict in the "Bush" column provides background, but Bush wasn't responsible for Viet Nam. It fails to make the point that Bush wasn't responsible for anything else, either.
I'm still looking over the johnkerry.com website, and while I'm finding some good policies hidden away on the 3rd and 4th levels of detail, the fact that that's where I find them points to a problem with "the vision thang." I'll be calling Trenton today to see if I can find who I need to help, but if you have any idea who I should be talking to I'd appreciate it if you'd forward the information.
best,
Joel