I'm not feeling very compatible today :-(

[yesthattom]

Wow, other people seem to have a lot better luck with this!

silverstripper 60% dieppe 56% topaz_munro 55% serenejournal 55% shirleym 54% keyne 52% smutprincess 52% trapezebear 50% uncledark 50% catya 49% dawn_guy 49% roosterbear 48% cappyhead 48% scherzoid 47% beowabbit 46% softlywhispered 46% webbitch 46% pookfreak 46% bitty 46% bunnygoth 45% ladymeg1 45% treacle_well 45% danielray 44% tactisle 41% anotherjen 41% cyan_blue 40% everythingbagel 39% jss1113 38% mommabear 37% johnstevensaul 37% salliesandbags 36% mizmoose 35% fj 35% grail76 34% cz_unit 34% jbsegal 33% sexyporky 30% kajmal 29% emmett_the_sane 28% solipsistnation 27% libidoergosum 25% krikket 25% tamidon 24% eeyore_grrl 23% pir 21% dglenn 21% jim_p 17% amberlyn2001 10% crs 6% How sexually compatible with me are you? Take the NEW sexual compatibility quiz at LJMatch!

Comments

[solipsistnation.livejournal.com]

Shoot, I came up only 50 percent compatible with my wife, so I'm not terribly inclined to trust it.

[beowabbit]

I didn’t get over about 65% compatible with anybody either. I wouldn’t worry about it; I’m just assuming that 65% is “pretty fuckin’ compatible”, so to speak. BTW, can I ask you to edit this entry and turn off auto-formatting (so newlines in the HTML don’t get translated to <br />), and remove the <pre>...</pre> tags? All your friends will be grateful, and the table will be easier to read.

[emmett-the-sane.livejournal.com]

The highest I've seen anybody score was 72%. I got 66% with someone I've been flirting with as my highest score. Seemed good to me.

The main thing that the test doesn't gather quite enough is flexibility. Like, with bdsm, I like to dom or occasionally sub, but I'm good with having just loving sex, too. And I think that the results might be more realistic if they were graded on a curve (meaning it wouldn't be accurate for the first few hundred people).

Other than that, though, I thought it was a pretty good test.

[dieppe.livejournal.com]

I'm not certain I completely trust the results of this one, not that I had a lot of faith in the previous one. I mean, well I'd think that just because you like or would do something doesn't necessarily mean you're compatible with that person, uh, sexually speaking. :}

[jss]

Well, they tried to be nonheterosexist in the query, allowing for nonmonogamy and not-just-mixed-gender partnerships. They didn't do a great job, IMO.

And again, these are the same folks who give extra credit to some matching questions to allow over 100% as a valid score. I definitely don't trust the results. (My best match so far is 55%.)

[browngirl.livejournal.com]

I think real life evidence means a *little* bit more than some stupid quiz. *wink*