yesthattom (
yesthattom) wrote2006-04-14 09:54 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Lost: Boys hat in Park Slope
http://www.gawker.com/news/park-slope/ the-park-slope-hat-spat-read-all-the-emails-166214.php
New York mag has a cute front-of-book item today on an only-in-Park-Slope battle that recently raged on an email list for earnest and progressive parents in that earnestly progressive Brooklyn neighborhood.
New York mag has a cute front-of-book item today on an only-in-Park-Slope battle that recently raged on an email list for earnest and progressive parents in that earnestly progressive Brooklyn neighborhood.
A few weeks ago, a member of the Park Slope Parents e-mail forum who’d encountered a stray piece of winterwear in the neighborhood posted a notice to the group titled “Found: boy’s hat.” … [S]ubscriber “Lisa” went public with her problems regarding the gender-specifying description of the hat.
no subject
no subject
Since my nephew was born and I started paying attention, I've developed a big problem with little kids' clothes. It seems the little boys are all stuck with lumberjack and/or jock drag and the little girls get stuck with princess/babydoll fluffy poodle drag. It's even signaled in their *clothes* that boys are active, girls are pretty objects...which is just crazy to me when all of them are going to be equally grubby, drooling little messes. On the bright side, any of the little boys who'll grow up to be bears and/or actual lumberjacks have the opportunity to be well-versed in appropriate fashion from a young age.
In any case, so a hat like this? It wouldn't even register for me that it may have been manufactured with one gender or the other in mind. It doesn't have a real or imagined sports team *or* gaggy pink maribu on it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Tolerance has to go both ways, and this was one of those harmless moments as far as gender identification goes.