yesthattom (
yesthattom) wrote2004-09-29 07:14 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah howard dean was right and would be beating bush right now, fuck you all and go to hell blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
no subject
But play fair if you're going to be hypothetical. The Bush campaign would run a different campaign agaisnt Dean -- he can't control his temper, his Bush-bashing could easily be cast as anti-American and anti-troops, and do we really want to have a First Lady with a career? It could easily have been a disaster of Mondalian proportions if Dean was as unprepared for the spotlight as he was during the primary.
It's true that I'm not as excited about the future that Kerry would bring in the way that I was in 1992, but at the same time I think that we have a very credible candidate who is capable of regaining momentum and getting Bush defeated. And, while I respect the right to free speech, dissing Kerry when the electoral college vote is still very turbulent doesn't help that momentum. I guess it depends on whether you'd rather have a Democratic president or four more years of going to hell down a greased poll so that Dean can save us in 2008....
(no subject)
no subject
not a valid comparison
no subject
no subject
female's chance in the US Air Force Academysnowball's chance in hell.